Home~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
+16
fasck
Acharlemagne
CrisoDer
McManis
Tuff Tiga
Begone13
NGAF
xDamon
14th
DoYouPlay_RS
King Of Dicing
Lucky
TheBlob
Arch Serene
Grim IReaper
Kelly
20 posters
Index :: Social :: Graphics :: Graphics Archive
Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3 
~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 12/5/2012, 7:10 am
Rules:
- Your entry must be your own work and made by you; stealing other people's work will not be tolerated.
- Your graphic cannot be pre-made. The graphic must have been created during the allotted time.
- Within the signature you submit you must have it say SOTW or what the theme is.
- No animated graphics, explicit images, text, or contents.
- Must follow all Smokin Mils rules (found here).
- Your submission must not be any larger than 500x225 (may change next SOTW, to take part in the dispute about this click here)
- When voting is up, you may not persuade others to vote for your entry. The object is to have people choose what they like the most and\or feel is the best
- You must post up all images you used to help you created your work. If you did not use any images to help create your graphic, you must show proof by taking a picture of your screen with the program(s) you used to create the graphic (you MUST have the layers tab up and showing; it may not be crossed out, blurred, or blocked in any way, shape, or form) and\or a screenshot where you can see this thread and the graphic you worked on. Failure to prove your work is your own and\or failure to show renders, stock images, C4Ds, or any other images used to help create your graphic will result in your entry becoming void.
Prizes:
- 1st place: 5M
- 2nd place: 3M
- 3rd place: 1M
- Public favorite: 1M
Theme: Magic
Entry Deadline: Friday, May 18, 2012
~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~
Fasck
Proof: [x], [x], [x]
DoYouPlay_RS
Proof: [x]
NGAF
proof: [x], [x]
14th
proof: [x]
Jayon
proof: [x], [x]
TheBegone13
proof: [x]
Stealth
proof: [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x]
McManins
proof: [x], [x], [x], [x], [x]
CrisoDer
proof: [x], [x]
Acharlemagne
proof: [x]
Tuff Tiga
proof: [x], [x], [x]
xDamon
proof: [x]
King of Dicing
Proof: [x], [x], [x], [x]
Grim lReaper
proof: [x]
- Your entry must be your own work and made by you; stealing other people's work will not be tolerated.
- Your graphic cannot be pre-made. The graphic must have been created during the allotted time.
- Within the signature you submit you must have it say SOTW or what the theme is.
- No animated graphics, explicit images, text, or contents.
- Must follow all Smokin Mils rules (found here).
- Your submission must not be any larger than 500x225 (may change next SOTW, to take part in the dispute about this click here)
- When voting is up, you may not persuade others to vote for your entry. The object is to have people choose what they like the most and\or feel is the best
- You must post up all images you used to help you created your work. If you did not use any images to help create your graphic, you must show proof by taking a picture of your screen with the program(s) you used to create the graphic (you MUST have the layers tab up and showing; it may not be crossed out, blurred, or blocked in any way, shape, or form) and\or a screenshot where you can see this thread and the graphic you worked on. Failure to prove your work is your own and\or failure to show renders, stock images, C4Ds, or any other images used to help create your graphic will result in your entry becoming void.
Prizes:
- 1st place: 5M
- 2nd place: 3M
- 3rd place: 1M
- Public favorite: 1M
Theme: Magic
Entry Deadline: Friday, May 18, 2012
~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~
Fasck
Proof: [x], [x], [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 6, the lantern is a light source and should behave like one; it should radiate light, not have it cut off just like that. The background, at first glance, looks appropriate but, because it appears to be at the same level as the faerie and is bright green, it draws too much attention.
Typography: 7, the text has some thematic relevance but in the grand scheme of things it feels disconnected.
Creativity: 6, the faerie isn’t blended in at all, and some white artefacts are visible around the staff, and there is some random white text in the bottom corners.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 6, the prominence of the background and the cutout appearance of the lantern heavily damage this piece.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 8, think the lightning could be a bit stronger and more effective, flow looks very good. Could use some more background blending with the render I think?
Typography: 8, text fits the whole sig
Creativity: 7, pretty cool signature but could use some more 'magic' effects I think
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 8, the white text at the bottom bothers me a bit.
DoYouPlay_RS
Proof: [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 9, the theme is not totally apparent with all the thingymajigs all around the place.
Lighting, flow, and depth: 5, the whole centre is too bright and the woman’s body is blurred while the hand (which has excessive contrast) and face are not; this creates a dual focus, which does not work well.
Typography: 6, bright white text next to an ever more bright whiteness is a bad combination.
Creativity: 6, the whole white glow around the woman doesn’t look very good, the ball of light on the left should not be darker than the other one; light sources do not work that way. Also, the border could do with a different blending option.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 5, the increase in brightness to create a focus is just too excessive and the distracting background pretty much cancels out that effort. It may have looked better if the whole background were alike the lower left half.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 7, could be a bit more 'magic'
Lighting, flow, and depth: 5, the glow around the render looks odd and besides a blur effect there isn't much blending. The lightning/shadowing also could use some work. It's all a bit too bright
Typography: 5, think the text font doesn't really match the magicv theme.
Creativity: 5, nothing really special done.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 6, bit too bright and could use some better blending
NGAF
proof: [x], [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 9, the left border is too light, thus distracting.
Typography: 6, simple but has little connection to the piece’s content.
Creativity: 8, the single pixel border on the left looks quite awkward, and the white letterbox doesn’t feel like the perfect choice.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 9, it is quite excellent until one notices the border that just doesn’t do justice to the piece.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 7, looks okay.
Typography: 4, it would've been better if the text was a part of the actual signature.
Creativity: 7 I like the noisy effect however I think there could be done something more with fireball in his hand. (or w/e it is)
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 7, don't really like the text and borders.
14th
proof: [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 8, great flow but it gets obstructed by the misplaced text, and the white glow on the right side feels a bit off, which also hurts the letterbox effect.
Typography: 6, the white text is too distracting while the purplish is not visible enough, and it could very much do with being placed just slightly to the left, preferably with a different blending option and/or font.
Creativity: 8, there appears to be a strange region on the bottom left part that kind of looks unfinished, and also the render is a bit too sharpened.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 8, the text isn’t too great but otherwise it’s quite nice.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 9
Lighting, flow, and depth: 8, great flow and lightning, shadowing could be a bit better.
Typography: 6, text isn't bad at all, I would've used a clipping mask tho.
Creativity: 7, left side is a bit too empty I think could've done more with that.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 7, doesn't look bad at all!
Jayon
proof: [x], [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 4, none of the elements appear to follow any flow and there’s little distinction between the render and the background in terms of depth. Also, the flame does not cause any illumination of anything while it should.
Typography: 3, the bottom text has a very rough outline that conflicts with the glow of a most horrible shade of blue; this combination of effects might have worked if the glow were of a less saturated blue.
Creativity: 5, the flame is good but nothing appears to be impacted from its bright light.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 5, the blast of fire is very nice but the rest, the inconsistent and incompatible styles bring the score down.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 9
Lighting, flow, and depth: 3, no real lightning done, and the render doens't blend in at all.
Typography: 2, text shouldn't be so far, and those 2 font's don't match at all.
Creativity: 4 I see what you're trying to do but needs a lot more work. The fire is quite nice tho.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 5, text needs a lot of work and looks very unfinished
TheBegone13
proof: [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 8, the colours are so bad they obscure the theme to a certain degree.
Lighting, flow, and depth: 2, there appears to be some sort of flow but that doesn’t help at all with the horribly horrible colours. Also, the render pretty much completely blends with the background.
Typography: 2, the colour is too similar to the background and it really could be placed slightly more left and down. It doesn’t feel like a part of the image at all.
Creativity: 2, the background appears to be of really low quality and that doesn’t help with the low quality render, which at parts is almost indiscernible from the background.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 2, that render should not have been chosen to base a signature on without making any edits to its appalling colours.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 9
Lighting, flow, and depth: 4, needs more lightning and flow!
Typography: 3, weird colour for the text and could use another font and text.
Creativity: 4, could use some more effects.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 4, quality is very bad and here and there it needs some work.
Stealth
proof: [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x], [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 9, the light next to his watch does not illuminate his hand like it should.
Typography: 7, jagged edges along with excessive use of effects does not amount to anything good; it would probably have looked better as simple black text without all the unnecessary, subtle effects.
Creativity: 10, all those little light add a really nice touch.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 9, a very use of various light effects though the text suffers from an overwhelming amount useless effects.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 9
Lighting, flow, and depth: 8, looks all very good imo!
Typography: 6, edges look a bit odd because of the glow I think, mayby another font would've worked better.
Creativity: 9 kinda like this style, the background stock could mayby use some work.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 8, text could use some work I think. Nice to see you're trying some different styles!
McManins
proof: [x], [x], [x], [x], [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 8, the spells’ light could really have had some impact on the surrounding elements, like the runestones.
Typography: 6, the golden text’s glow is cut off on its right, and the white text has legibility problems due to being anti-aliased bitmap text.
Creativity: 7, the runes might have not been the best idea the way they were implemented. Also, the background isn’t very effective for this piece.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 7, it’s a fancy idea but it lacks a spark.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 9
Lighting, flow, and depth: 8, the fires lightning could use some work I think, other than that it looks good!
Typography: 5, placement could be closer to the text, and the My magic level is a 99 really didn't have to be in the RS font imo.
Creativity: 7, really like the idea
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 7, here and there it still needs some small improvements.
CrisoDer
proof: [x], [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 6, the orbs of light are perhaps too prominent for their own good; they distract from the render a tad too much.
Typography: 5, the colours are too vibrant against such a dark background, and there’s no blending done.
Creativity: 5, little has been done to blend in the render; this is most noticeable around the tip of the staff. Also, all the orbs of light not in the bottom right corner are kind of jagged and not really consistent with the former.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 6, the render looks good on the background but the text throws in a monkey wrench.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 5, I'm missing the lightning and the render isn't really in a flow with the background.
Typography: 3, using a font like that is a no go, and try to move your text closer to the render.
Creativity: 5, think you could've done more with the render and the background..
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 6, try to work on your text and on the blending with the background
Acharlemagne
proof: [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 6, too much going on at once, so the focus is unclear. Also, the balls of energy do not illuminate the body like it would be expected.
Typography: 5, its placement isn’t very good and the colour is kind of weird in combination with those effects; maybe a texture could be added to make it fit in better.
Creativity: 5, the effects’ colours don’t really match up with the orbs’.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 5, overwhelming amount of stuff yet it largely feels disconnected.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 6, almost no flow with the background, the render doesn't feel a part of the bg at all.
Typography: 5, the effects are actually quite okay, but the placement and the big font size ruin it. Try moving it closer to the render and lowering the size a bit.
Creativity: 4, think you could've done more with the orbs and the background scenery.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 5, doesn't really feel as a complete signature.
Tuff Tiga
proof: [x], [x], [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 8, the light on the left might be just a bit too bright; it would be nice if it would reveal some more detail underneath. Also, the bolt of light on the right is kind of dark.
Typography: 10, it’s gracefully simplistic.
Creativity: 8, the letterbox effect doesn’t well together with the darkish, desaturated colours on the right side.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 9, it’s pretty but lighting could be improved.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 9
Lighting, flow, and depth: 7, the left side is way to bright, other than that all looks quite ok.
Typography: 7, placement could be better at the left side of the signature, and mayby with a clipping mask effect then (white wouldn't be visible there)
Creativity: 6, I think you could've made a good use of the fireball on the official render in his hands.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 7, overall pretty good, mayby a small improvement to the lightning and text.
xDamon
proof: [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 9, it all looks just a bit too washed out.
Typography: 10, elegant and beautiful.
Creativity: 9, the border doesn’t feel right; it would probably look better without the black sides.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 10, it’s great and the little quirks do not hurt it much.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 7, not everyone will immediately see it's magic related.
Lighting, flow, and depth: 8, looks pretty good, mayby a little bit too bright.
Typography: 9, simple but still very good, that's how I like it.
Creativity: 7
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 8, aside from it being a bit too bright mayby, it's a very good sig!
King of Dicing
Proof: [x], [x], [x], [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 4, the depth is very unclear and all the shiny effects are confusing.
Typography: 3, in all honesty, it would have looked better as plain text
Creativity: 3, a mishmash of stuff, and nothing has been done to blend in any of it.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 3, it doesn’t have any visible attempt at unifying all of the stuff that’s in there; it’s probably too large for its own good.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 9
Lighting, flow, and depth: 6, looks quite odd since the background is black & white while the render is not.
Typography: 3, keep your text simple, this one is just too complicated.
Creativity: 3, still needs a lot of work.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 5, try to not combine black & white bg with a colored render, usually doesn't work very good. Try using other blending modes for your C4D so they are actually a part of the signature.
Grim lReaper
proof: [x]
- Inhap's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 10, very clear as to what is the focus and the positioning is excellent.
Typography: 9, quite disappointing compared to the rest of the image; at parts it’s far too light and that ruins it.
Creativity: 10, excellent job at blending all of the elements and adding subtle touches to it.
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 10, a truly great piece.
- Jiri's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, and depth: 9, lightning is very good, the lightning coming from his wand looks very realistic
Typography: 8, it matches the signature but I still think it could use some improvement.
Creativity: 8, very nice work on combining all the stocks to become such a great scenery
Overall look\feel\effectiveness\composition: 9, bottom right side smoke is a bit too blurry, aside from that it's very good!
Last edited by Kelly on 13/10/2012, 8:55 am; edited 6 times in total
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Grim IReaper 12/5/2012, 7:25 am
In B4 Someone posts a Harry Potter or Gandalf signature!
Grim IReaper- Forum Addict (750 posts)
Arch Serene- Tier 4 (500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by TheBlob 12/5/2012, 5:50 pm
Grim IReaper wrote:In B4 Someone posts a Harry Potter or Gandalf signature!
Dibs on Gandalf!
TheBlob- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Lucky 12/5/2012, 6:06 pm
Interesting to see how people will take this...
Lucky- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by King Of Dicing 12/5/2012, 7:53 pm
Long time since I did graphics, but here is my entry 
It didn't came out 100% as I wanted it to be, but oh well.. :p
Good luck to everyone
Cheers,
King of Dicing
Renders/stocks/C4D's:
- Spoiler:
It didn't came out 100% as I wanted it to be, but oh well.. :p
Good luck to everyone
Cheers,
King of Dicing
Renders/stocks/C4D's:
- Spoiler:
This picture shows up in some strange way when I upload it here.. Not sure why.
1. Render
2. Background
3. C4D (1)
4. C4D (2)
King Of Dicing- Forum Fanatic (1000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Arch Serene 12/5/2012, 9:46 pm
not exactly what i wanted it too look, ill change it some time
http://www.3drt.com/savers/dark_mansion/dark_forest_mansion_moon-2.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/7SX8p.jpg
Arch Serene- Tier 4 (500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by DoYouPlay_RS 12/5/2012, 10:46 pm
I made mine better. Alot better. I spent half an hour working on the lighting, and I think it's my best one yet.
- Proof:
Last edited by DoYouPlay_RS on 13/5/2012, 10:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
DoYouPlay_RS- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by 14th 13/5/2012, 1:58 am
Entry:
Render(s) used:
- Spoiler:
Render(s) used:
- Spoiler:
Last edited by 14th on 13/5/2012, 7:40 pm; edited 1 time in total
14th- Tier 1 (Registered)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by DoYouPlay_RS 13/5/2012, 5:10 am
Music God wrote:
not exactly what i wanted it too look, ill change it some time
http://www.3drt.com/savers/dark_mansion/dark_forest_mansion_moon-2.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/7SX8p.jpg
By the way, why is the magician render all corrupted?
DoYouPlay_RS- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by xDamon 13/5/2012, 11:41 am
I'll probably make a Harry Potter signature 
xDamon- Tier 3 (300 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by NGAF 13/5/2012, 1:14 pm
my entery:
Picture of layers:
Image used (rendered myself):
Picture of layers:
- Spoiler:
https://2img.net/h/i1161.photobucket.com/albums/q512/N-G-A-F/Untitled-1.jpg
Image used (rendered myself):
- Spoiler:
NGAF- Tier 3 (300 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Begone13 13/5/2012, 6:45 pm
Per request of my cuz, Tuff Tiga i'll enter this one >.>
- Spoiler:
Begone13- Forum Master (1500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Tuff Tiga 14/5/2012, 1:23 am
TheBegone13 wrote:Per request of my cuz, Tuff Tiga i'll enter this one >.>
- Spoiler:
Good job
Ima test run this render too LOL but it won't be my entry.
Tuff Tiga- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by McManis 14/5/2012, 2:37 am
My entry.
Stock Images:
Stock Images:
- Spoiler:
Last edited by McManis on 17/5/2012, 3:04 pm; edited 8 times in total
McManis- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Grim IReaper 16/5/2012, 12:14 pm
Here's my entry:
And he's my proof:
And he's my proof:
Grim IReaper- Forum Addict (750 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by CrisoDer 16/5/2012, 5:02 pm
My first entry:
proof:
proof:
- Spoiler:
render:
abstract:
CrisoDer- Forum Fanatic (1000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Acharlemagne 16/5/2012, 6:46 pm
Here's my attempt. Good luck everyone
EDIT: I've made another few touches to it (The flames ;D)
Previous version:
Got the PSD here-
EDIT: I've made another few touches to it (The flames ;D)
Previous version:
- Spoiler:
Got the PSD here-
- Spoiler:
Last edited by Acharlemagne on 17/5/2012, 7:18 pm; edited 2 times in total
Acharlemagne- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by DoYouPlay_RS 16/5/2012, 8:02 pm
Acharlemagne wrote:Here's my attempt. Good luck everyone
Got the PSD here-
- Spoiler:
Unfortunately your signature exceeds the limit of 500x225
DoYouPlay_RS- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Acharlemagne 16/5/2012, 8:21 pm
DoYouPlay_RS wrote:Acharlemagne wrote:Here's my attempt. Good luck everyone
Got the PSD here-
- Spoiler:
Unfortunately your signature exceeds the limit of 500x225
Haha that's depressing, I just based it off of my signature size, forgot about the max one here.
- Spoiler:
I edited it, it's 500 exactly ;D Thanks for the heads up
Acharlemagne- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 16/5/2012, 8:36 pm
Acharlemagne, please edit your first entries' post and put your final there
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Acharlemagne 16/5/2012, 8:50 pm
I changed it was my bad, forgot to check the size requirements
was my bad, forgot to check the size requirements
Acharlemagne- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Tuff Tiga- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Lucky 16/5/2012, 11:11 pm
I'm attempting something.... Hopefully I finish in time! 
Lucky- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #37 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by fasck 17/5/2012, 9:16 am
@tuff: You should really fill out that empty space, or move the render more to the middle. Its a nice signature.
fasck- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics» SOTW #19 - WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #32 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED!
» ~*~ SOTW #45 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» SOTW #20 - WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #33 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #32 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED!
» ~*~ SOTW #45 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» SOTW #20 - WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #33 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
Index :: Social :: Graphics :: Graphics Archive
Page 1 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|