Home~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
+13
liortulip
Sneakily
Jiggie
Josh Designs
NGAF
Atlas
Arch Serene
Inomonu
DoYouPlay_RS
insidious
Stitch
Zeus
Kelly
17 posters
Index :: Social :: Graphics :: Graphics Archive
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2 
Which entry is the best?
~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 15/9/2012, 6:10 am
Rules:
- Your entry must be your own work and made by you; stealing other people's work will not be tolerated.
- Your graphic cannot be pre-made. The graphic must have been created during the allotted time.
- Within the signature you submit you must have it say SOTW or what the theme is.
- No animated graphics, explicit images, text, or contents.
- Must follow all Smokin Mils rules (found here).
- Your submission must not be any larger than 500x225 (may change next SOTW, to take part in the dispute about this click here)
- When voting is up, you may not persuade others to vote for your entry. The object is to have people choose what they like the most and\or feel is the best
- You must post up all images you used to help you created your work. If you did not use any images to help create your graphic, you must show proof by taking a picture of your screen with the program(s) you used to create the graphic (you MUST have the layers tab up and showing; it may not be crossed out, blurred, or blocked in any way, shape, or form) and\or a screenshot where you can see this thread and the graphic you worked on. Failure to prove your work is your own and\or failure to show renders, stock images, C4Ds, or any other images used to help create your graphic will result in your entry becoming void.
Prizes:
- 1st place: 5M
- 2nd place: 3M
- 3rd place: 1M
- Public favorite: 1M
Theme: Render Challenge (must use specific render to create their entry)
Entry Deadline: Friday, September 21, 2012
What is the "Render Challenge?"
You must use the render in the spoiler below to quality for this SOTW. Render that must be used:
First place: Josh Designs
Proof: [x]
Second place: DoYouPlay_RS
Proof: [x]
Third place & public favorite: Wheatley
Proof: [x]
Inomonu
Proof: [x], [x]
Smokin` Baby
Proof: [x], [x]
NGAF
Proof: [x]
Sneakily
Proof: [x]
liortulip
Proof: [x], [x]
- Your entry must be your own work and made by you; stealing other people's work will not be tolerated.
- Your graphic cannot be pre-made. The graphic must have been created during the allotted time.
- Within the signature you submit you must have it say SOTW or what the theme is.
- No animated graphics, explicit images, text, or contents.
- Must follow all Smokin Mils rules (found here).
- Your submission must not be any larger than 500x225 (may change next SOTW, to take part in the dispute about this click here)
- When voting is up, you may not persuade others to vote for your entry. The object is to have people choose what they like the most and\or feel is the best
- You must post up all images you used to help you created your work. If you did not use any images to help create your graphic, you must show proof by taking a picture of your screen with the program(s) you used to create the graphic (you MUST have the layers tab up and showing; it may not be crossed out, blurred, or blocked in any way, shape, or form) and\or a screenshot where you can see this thread and the graphic you worked on. Failure to prove your work is your own and\or failure to show renders, stock images, C4Ds, or any other images used to help create your graphic will result in your entry becoming void.
Prizes:
- 1st place: 5M
- 2nd place: 3M
- 3rd place: 1M
- Public favorite: 1M
Theme: Render Challenge (must use specific render to create their entry)
Entry Deadline: Friday, September 21, 2012
What is the "Render Challenge?"
You must use the render in the spoiler below to quality for this SOTW. Render that must be used:
- Spoiler:
~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ Entries ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~
First place: Josh Designs
Proof: [x]
- "Tuff Tiga's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 9
Typography (rate from 1-10): 8
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 9
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 8
- "Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 8, the greenish tinge and the texture of the flame sticks out too much.
Typography: 10, a very elegant approach.
Creativity: 9
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 9
Second place: DoYouPlay_RS
Proof: [x]
- "Tuff Tiga's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 7
Typography (rate from 1-10): 6
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 6
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 6 Something just stirs my stomach... :s
- "Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 8, looks somewhat washed out.
Typography: 8
Creativity: 8
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 8, the diagonal lines are perhaps too strong in places.
Third place & public favorite: Wheatley
Proof: [x]
- "Tuff Tiga's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 9
Typography (rate from 1-10): 6 Too hard to read.
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 8
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 7
- "Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 6, the white glowy spots aren't right.
Typography: 7
Creativity: 6
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 7
Inomonu
Proof: [x], [x]
- "Tuff Tiga's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 6
Typography (rate from 1-10): 5 Simple!!
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 7
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 5 I bit too much contrast if you ask me. Too bright.
- "Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 6
Typography: 3, attempt to match the high-contrast style of the signature gone bad; the bevel shouldn't be as soft as it is.
Creativity: 7
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 6, the text absolutely butchers it, but I quite like the background.
Smokin` Baby
Proof: [x], [x]
- "Tuff Tiga's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 7
Typography (rate from 1-10): 5 As I said above, simple!
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 7
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 6 The C4D at the top takes away as well as the black line from the flames which I assume is meant to be smoke.
- "Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 4, it's barely anything more than a collection of several renders.
Typography: 2, completely unfitting font.
Creativity: 3
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 3
NGAF
Proof: [x]
- "Tuff Tiga's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 6
Typography (rate from 1-10): 4 Too far away from the focus.
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 6
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 6
- "Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 8, the flame doesn't go well with the fractals.
Typography: 9, it seems a bit odd, perhaps because of the surrounding grey.
Creativity: 8
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 8
Sneakily
Proof: [x]
- "Tuff Tiga's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 6
Typography (rate from 1-10): 8
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 6 Think out of the box for your background next time.
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 7
- "Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 6, lighting on the body parts on the right look like straight from a cheap 3D model.
Typography: 8
Creativity: 6
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 6
liortulip
Proof: [x], [x]
- "Tuff Tiga's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 7
Typography (rate from 1-10): 7 Dont make the text stick out too much or your main focus is lost.
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 6
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 6
- "Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 4
Typography: 2, such emboss and colour is definitely the wrong choice.
Creativity: 3
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 3
Last edited by Kelly on 11/10/2012, 7:16 pm; edited 3 times in total
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Zeus 15/9/2012, 6:15 am
Awesome! This is definitely going to be a fun one. I'm very excited. Great choice of render in my opinion. 
Zeus- Forum Fanatic (1000 posts)
Stitch- Tier 4 (500 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by insidious 15/9/2012, 2:51 pm
:O OMG FINALLY!! Ive been waiting for something like this since forever! 
insidious- Tier 1 (Registered)
DoYouPlay_RS- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Inomonu 15/9/2012, 6:18 pm
Le proofs
Finished article. Woooo.
- Spoiler:
A light render I used.
A screenshot of the PSD. - had to collapse the text layers, but only included strokes, gradient overlay, pattern overlay, kinda thing.
Finished article. Woooo.
Inomonu- Forum Fanatic (1000 posts)
Arch Serene- Tier 4 (500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Arch Serene 16/9/2012, 10:13 am
nice V Vheatly :L
i fail with c4d and text :p
here my failed attempt (will try improve ^^)
edited;
Still need to improve text :L im really bad with it lol
i fail with c4d and text :p
here my failed attempt (will try improve ^^)
edited;
Still need to improve text :L im really bad with it lol
- Spoiler:
[img]https://2img.net/h/oi49.tinypic.com/e0ramr.png[img]
Last edited by Smokin` Baby on 18/9/2012, 5:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Arch Serene- Tier 4 (500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by NGAF 16/9/2012, 11:00 am
Taking part of this fast , missed last one.
First try with a vertical one.
proof:
First try with a vertical one.
proof:
- Spoiler:
- http://www.upload.ee/image/2678650/Untitled.png
NGAF- Tier 3 (300 posts)
Josh Designs- Forum Addict (750 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by DoYouPlay_RS 16/9/2012, 6:18 pm
By no means do I expect to win this, its quite bad for me imo.
Last edited by DoYouPlay_RS on 21/9/2012, 10:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
DoYouPlay_RS- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Jiggie 17/9/2012, 7:02 pm
Well, I hoped that the render would have been of higher quality, but I suppose that's what makes this a challenge.
Jiggie- Forum Master (1500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Arch Serene 17/9/2012, 8:28 pm
OMG Jiggie <3 (my old gfx teacher).
For some reason the colours i see on photoshop are less vibrant than it looks on here...
My entry looks better on photoshop lol.. ill try and sort that out and work on the blooming text
For some reason the colours i see on photoshop are less vibrant than it looks on here...
My entry looks better on photoshop lol.. ill try and sort that out and work on the blooming text
Arch Serene- Tier 4 (500 posts)
Sneakily- Tier 1 (Registered)
Stitch- Tier 4 (500 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Atlas 18/9/2012, 10:10 pm
stitch wrote:sorry, when is this in voting
Kelly wrote:Entry Deadline: Friday, September 21, 2012
Last edited by Wheatley on 19/9/2012, 3:08 am; edited 1 time in total
Atlas- Tier 4 (500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by liortulip 19/9/2012, 2:33 am
This is my first true signature so I understand that it is not very good . I tried really hard on it anyway and I am trying to improve. Here it is:
Proof
. I tried really hard on it anyway and I am trying to improve. Here it is:Proof
- Spoiler:
liortulip- Tier 2 (100 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Stitch 19/9/2012, 7:50 am
Wheatley wrote:stitch wrote:sorry, when is this in votingKelly wrote:Entry Deadline: Friday, September 21, 2012
thanks, was on my phone and couldnt see most things
Stitch- Tier 4 (500 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 19/9/2012, 2:02 pm
Just a friendly reminder, two days remain to place entries.
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 21/9/2012, 8:07 pm
This goes into voting tonight; you still have several hours left, guys, so let's see one or two more entries!
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 22/9/2012, 7:56 pm
Gone into voting, good luck guys
NGAF, Leakee, your posts were removed. Please don't spam this topic with off topic material. Leakee, you can private message me, but rather than spam the topic can you please remember that it's a two way communication?
I have a life and am a full time college student. If I don't reply within one week of the message you send, resend it. I get A LOT of messages weekly and honestly? Sometimes I don't get to respond to them all before they go away, that's how many I get.
So PM me, if I don't reply within one week, resend it. Patience is a virtue, please understand that
NGAF, Leakee, your posts were removed. Please don't spam this topic with off topic material. Leakee, you can private message me, but rather than spam the topic can you please remember that it's a two way communication?
I have a life and am a full time college student. If I don't reply within one week of the message you send, resend it. I get A LOT of messages weekly and honestly? Sometimes I don't get to respond to them all before they go away, that's how many I get.
So PM me, if I don't reply within one week, resend it. Patience is a virtue, please understand that
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Inomonu 22/9/2012, 8:10 pm
Just checking - we're not supposed to vote for ourselves right? 
Inomonu- Forum Fanatic (1000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by DoYouPlay_RS 23/9/2012, 6:33 pm
Voted Josh, Sneakily is my #2
DoYouPlay_RS- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #51 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Inomonu 23/9/2012, 7:47 pm
I voted Sneakily, and Josh would have been my number two
Inomonu- Forum Fanatic (1000 posts)
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics» SOTW #19 - WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #32 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED!
» ~*~ SOTW #45 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» SOTW #20 - WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #33 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #32 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED!
» ~*~ SOTW #45 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» SOTW #20 - WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #33 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
Index :: Social :: Graphics :: Graphics Archive
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|