Home~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
+7
Ross L
Atlas
DoYouPlay_RS
Goldboy
Josh Designs
Blackyy
Kelly
11 posters
Index :: Social :: Graphics :: Graphics Archive
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2 
Which entry do you think is the best?
~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 4/11/2012, 5:51 pm
Rules:
- Your entry must be your own work and made by you; stealing other people's work will not be tolerated.
- Your graphic cannot be pre-made. The graphic must have been created during the allotted time.
- Within the signature you submit you must have it say SOTW or what the theme is.
- No animated graphics, explicit images, text, or contents.
- Must follow all Smokin Mils rules (found here).
- Your submission must not be any larger than 500x225 (may change next SOTW, to take part in the dispute about this click here)
- When voting is up, you may not persuade others to vote for your entry. The object is to have people choose what they like the most and\or feel is the best
- You must post up all images you used to help you created your work. If you did not use any images to help create your graphic, you must show proof by taking a picture of your screen with the program(s) you used to create the graphic (you MUST have the layers tab up and showing; it may not be crossed out, blurred, or blocked in any way, shape, or form) and\or a screenshot where you can see this thread and the graphic you worked on. Failure to prove your work is your own and\or failure to show renders, stock images, C4Ds, or any other images used to help create your graphic will result in your entry becoming void.
Prizes:
- 1st place: 5M
- 2nd place: 3M
- 3rd place: 1M
- Public favorite: 1M
Theme: Time Travel
Entry Deadline: Friday, November 9th
First place & public favorite: Josh Designs
Proof: [x]
Second place: Atlas
Proof: [x]
Third place: Ross L
Proof: upload proof ASAP.
Goldboy
Proof: [x]
Tekiable
Proof: [x]
Daxy
Proof: [x], [x], [x], [x]
- Your entry must be your own work and made by you; stealing other people's work will not be tolerated.
- Your graphic cannot be pre-made. The graphic must have been created during the allotted time.
- Within the signature you submit you must have it say SOTW or what the theme is.
- No animated graphics, explicit images, text, or contents.
- Must follow all Smokin Mils rules (found here).
- Your submission must not be any larger than 500x225 (may change next SOTW, to take part in the dispute about this click here)
- When voting is up, you may not persuade others to vote for your entry. The object is to have people choose what they like the most and\or feel is the best
- You must post up all images you used to help you created your work. If you did not use any images to help create your graphic, you must show proof by taking a picture of your screen with the program(s) you used to create the graphic (you MUST have the layers tab up and showing; it may not be crossed out, blurred, or blocked in any way, shape, or form) and\or a screenshot where you can see this thread and the graphic you worked on. Failure to prove your work is your own and\or failure to show renders, stock images, C4Ds, or any other images used to help create your graphic will result in your entry becoming void.
Prizes:
- 1st place: 5M
- 2nd place: 3M
- 3rd place: 1M
- Public favorite: 1M
Theme: Time Travel
Entry Deadline: Friday, November 9th
~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~
First place & public favorite: Josh Designs
Proof: [x]
- DoYouPlay_RS's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 9, beautiful
Typography (rate from 1-10): 9
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 8
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 9
Other: Well done as usual
- Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 10
Typography: 10
Creativity: 10
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 10
Other: Stop being so good.
- Todgott's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 9
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 7
Typography (rate from 1-10): 9
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 8
Overall feellookeffectivenesscomposition (rate from 1-10): 8
Other: If you want to know why I placed the mark I did, you can PM me
Second place: Atlas
Proof: [x]
- DoYouPlay_RS's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 9, excellent
Typography (rate from 1-10): 8.5, I really love it, it just takes away too much attention
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 8.5
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 9
Other:
- Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 7 - The background is too flat, chaotic and attention-grabbing. With the background being as it is, the lighting on the kid just doesn't feel right.
Typography: 9 - Quite relevant and well-placed.
Creativity: 7
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 7
- Todgott's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 8
Typography (rate from 1-10): 7 Colors of text are too saturated compared to other parts of sig :/
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 9
Overall feellookeffectivenesscomposition (rate from 1-10): 10
Other: If you want to know why I placed the mark I did, you can PM me
Third place: Ross L
Proof: upload proof ASAP.
- DoYouPlay_RS's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, Flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 7.5, it could be better lighting
Typography (rate from 1-10): 8, pretty plain, but it works
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 7, I like what you did with the streaks
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 8
Other:
- Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, Flow, depth: 8
Typography: 7
Creativity: 8
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 8 - Tennant is cut out somewhat sloppily.
- Todgott's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 7
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 8
Typography (rate from 1-10): 7
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 6
Overall feellookeffectivenesscomposition (rate from 1-10): 6
Other: If you want to know why I placed the mark I did, you can PM me
Goldboy
Proof: [x]
- DoYouPlay_RS's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 10
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 5, lighting is pretty bad and theres not much depth
Typography (rate from 1-10): 6, bad placement, just bad in general
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 6, I see what you were going at
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 6
Other:
- Inhaps's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 6 - Besides the face, nothing really points to timetravel; it's lacking signature gear.
Lighting, flow, depth: 5
Typography: 3
Creativity: 5
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 5
- Todgott's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 7
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 5
Typography (rate from 1-10): 5
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 7
Overall feellookeffectivenesscomposition (rate from 1-10): 6
Other: If you want to know why I placed the mark I did, you can PM me
Tekiable
Proof: [x]
- DoYouPlay_RS's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 7. Yours doesnt show the travel, just the time
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 5, needs work
Typography (rate from 1-10): 4, minimal effort was put into it. Poor style, poor location
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 5, I see what you were going at.
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 5
Other:
- Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 10
Lighting, flow, depth: 8
Typography: 6 - Odd placement.
Creativity: 8
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 8 - It's eye candy.
- Todgott's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 8
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 3
Typography (rate from 1-10): 7
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 4
Overall feellookeffectivenesscomposition (rate from 1-10): 4
Other: If you want to know why I placed the mark I did, you can PM me
Daxy
Proof: [x], [x], [x], [x]
- DoYouPlay_RS's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 8.5
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 7.5
Typography (rate from 1-10): 7, the bottom seems like a lazy job
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 8, I like your idea
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition (rate from 1-10): 8, something just doesn't seem right
Other:
- Inhaps's critique:
Theme: 9
Lighting, flow, depth: 6
Typography: 6 - Unnecessary variation and the gradient colouring looks really cheap.
Creativity: 7
Overall feel\look\effectiveness\composition: 6
- Todgott's critique:
Theme (rate from 1-10): 7
Lighting, flow, depth (rate from 1-10): 3
Typography (rate from 1-10): 6
Creativity (rate from 1-10): 8
Overall feellookeffectivenesscomposition (rate from 1-10): 5
Other: If you want to know why I placed the mark I did, you can PM me
Last edited by Kelly on 17/11/2012, 11:50 pm; edited 3 times in total
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Blackyy- Forum Master (1500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Josh Designs 4/11/2012, 9:14 pm
Proof:
- Spoiler:
Last edited by Josh Designs on 12/11/2012, 12:10 am; edited 3 times in total
Josh Designs- Forum Addict (750 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Goldboy 5/11/2012, 3:41 am
Proof :
- Spoiler:
Last edited by Goldboy on 10/11/2012, 5:58 am; edited 1 time in total
Goldboy- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by DoYouPlay_RS 5/11/2012, 3:42 am
Ohh boy, this is gonna be tough...
DoYouPlay_RS- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Atlas 5/11/2012, 4:01 pm
Proof:
)Last edited by Atlas on 9/11/2012, 5:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Atlas- Tier 4 (500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Ross L 5/11/2012, 10:03 pm
Proof uploading atm.
[/center]Last edited by Ross L on 8/11/2012, 4:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Ross L- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 8/11/2012, 2:55 pm
Ross, yours isn't working 
Nice entries so far Let's see some more 
Nice entries so far
Let's see some more
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Ross L 8/11/2012, 4:02 pm
Kelly wrote:Ross, yours isn't working
Nice entries so far
changed!
Ross L- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Tekiable 8/11/2012, 8:34 pm
Proof:
Good luck, everyone!
Last edited by Tekiable on 9/11/2012, 11:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
Tekiable- Tier 1 (Registered)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by DoYouPlay_RS 8/11/2012, 9:00 pm
Atlas and Tekiable, both of your entries are too big 
Max is 500x225
Max is 500x225
DoYouPlay_RS- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Atlas 8/11/2012, 9:23 pm
Ohhh damn rofl, 240 height. I forgot about that! xD first time that's happened to me beforeDoYouPlay_RS wrote:Atlas and Tekiable, both of your entries are too big
Atlas- Tier 4 (500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Tekiable 8/11/2012, 9:30 pm
Personally, I think 225 height is too restrictive. Should change that.
Tekiable- Tier 1 (Registered)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by DoYouPlay_RS 8/11/2012, 10:24 pm
Goldboy wrote:
Proof :
- Spoiler:
You need to include "SOTW" on your entry, and if It's there, I cant find it. That tells you something.
DoYouPlay_RS- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Goldboy 9/11/2012, 9:32 pm
DoYouPlay_RS wrote:Goldboy wrote:
Proof :
- Spoiler:
You need to include "SOTW" on your entry, and if It's there, I cant find it. That tells you something.
I simply put 'back in time' under his chin as I thought that would be enough. The hot tub time machine signature doesn't have "SOTW" on it either.
Goldboy- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 9/11/2012, 11:31 pm
Goldboy wrote:DoYouPlay_RS wrote:Goldboy wrote:
Proof :
- Spoiler:
You need to include "SOTW" on your entry, and if It's there, I cant find it. That tells you something.
I simply put 'back in time' under his chin as I thought that would be enough. The hot tub time machine signature doesn't have "SOTW" on it either.
Something referencing time travel for text is fine. Although, I must admit, until you mentioned it, I could hardly read/see the text.
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Tekiable 9/11/2012, 11:48 pm
Changed the resolution of my entry.
I still think 225 height is too restrictive. Change it. :<
I still think 225 height is too restrictive. Change it. :<
Tekiable- Tier 1 (Registered)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by DoYouPlay_RS 9/11/2012, 11:57 pm
Tekiable wrote:Changed the resolution of my entry.
I still think 225 height is too restrictive. Change it. :<
Rules are rules. Just because you dont like them doesnt mean we should change them to meet your wants
DoYouPlay_RS- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Tekiable 10/11/2012, 12:20 am
Oh but ye nonsensical dribble be fascinating, sir!
I was merely suggesting it. You can't get better if you get restricted like this, and I guess we ALL want to get better?
I was merely suggesting it. You can't get better if you get restricted like this, and I guess we ALL want to get better?
Tekiable- Tier 1 (Registered)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Goldboy 10/11/2012, 5:59 am
Kelly wrote:Goldboy wrote:DoYouPlay_RS wrote:Goldboy wrote:
Proof :
- Spoiler:
You need to include "SOTW" on your entry, and if It's there, I cant find it. That tells you something.
I simply put 'back in time' under his chin as I thought that would be enough. The hot tub time machine signature doesn't have "SOTW" on it either.
Something referencing time travel for text is fine. Although, I must admit, until you mentioned it, I could hardly read/see the text.
Edited my text and entry, thanks for your input!
Goldboy- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 10/11/2012, 6:09 am
You're welcome Going to leave this open for another 24 hours, see if anyone else wishes to put an entry in. If not, I'll put this into voting.
Going to leave this open for another 24 hours, see if anyone else wishes to put an entry in. If not, I'll put this into voting.
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Daxy- Tier 3 (300 posts)
-
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by todgott 12/11/2012, 1:52 pm
Atlas, hands down. The best signature i've seen from you so far!
todgott- Tier 4 (500 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Ross L 13/11/2012, 3:25 pm
here's my proof, sorry, I completely forgot to upload it last week! >_<
- Spoiler:
Ross L- Tier 2 (100 posts)
Re: ~*~ SOTW #56 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
by Kelly 16/11/2012, 10:26 am
Winners will be announced before the evening (probably a bit after I wake up). Were some really interesting entries with this one
Kelly- Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics» SOTW #19 - WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #32 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED!
» ~*~ SOTW #45 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» SOTW #20 - WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #33 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #32 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED!
» ~*~ SOTW #45 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» SOTW #20 - WINNERS ANNOUNCED
» ~*~ SOTW #33 ~*~ WINNERS ANNOUNCED
Index :: Social :: Graphics :: Graphics Archive
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|